Qwen3-Max-Thinking: Alibaba's AI That Got Perfect Math Scores (2026 Guide)
Alibaba released Qwen3-Max-Thinking on January 26, 2026 - the first Chinese AI model to achieve 100% accuracy on AIME (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) and the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. With 1 trillion parameters and a novel "test-time scaling" approach, it outperforms GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.5 on key benchmarks.
What Is Qwen3-Max-Thinking?
Qwen3-Max-Thinking is Alibaba Cloud's flagship reasoning model, released January 26, 2026. It's the "thinking" variant of Qwen3-Max, optimized for complex reasoning tasks through a technique called "test-time scaling."
The model was trained on 36 trillion tokens and can process inputs as long as one million words or symbols. It's positioned as a direct competitor to OpenAI's GPT-5.2-Thinking and Claude Opus 4.5.
Historic Achievement
Qwen3-Max-Thinking is the first Chinese AI model to achieve 100% accuracy on both the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament (HMMT). These are among the most challenging high school math competitions in the world.
Key Features
Test-Time Scaling
Unlike standard inference, Qwen3 trades compute for intelligence at runtime. More thinking time = better answers.
1M Token Context
Process million-word documents, entire codebases, or extensive research papers in a single prompt.
Adaptive Tool Use
On-demand retrieval and code interpreter invocation built into the reasoning process.
OpenAI API Compatible
Switch from GPT-5 by changing base_url and model name. Also supports Anthropic protocol.
Claude Code Compatible
Works with Claude Code agentic coding environment out of the box via Anthropic protocol support.
Multi-Round Strategy
Experience-cumulative reasoning that builds on previous attempts rather than naive best-of-N sampling.
The Test-Time Scaling Innovation
The core innovation driving Qwen3-Max-Thinking is a departure from standard inference methods. While most models generate tokens linearly, Qwen3 uses "heavy mode" driven by test-time scaling.
How Test-Time Scaling Works
- Initial reasoning: Model generates a first attempt at the problem
- Self-verification: Model checks its own work for errors
- Iterative refinement: Multiple rounds of thinking, each building on previous attempts
- Experience accumulation: Unlike "best-of-N" that picks from independent attempts, Qwen3 learns from each round
- Adaptive compute: Harder problems automatically get more thinking time
# Example: Math problem solving with test-time scaling
# The model internally performs multiple reasoning rounds
Problem: "Prove that for any positive integers a, b, c:
(a+b+c)^3 >= 27abc"
Round 1: Direct algebraic approach...
→ Partial progress, identifies AM-GM might apply
Round 2: Building on Round 1, applies AM-GM inequality...
→ Gets closer, but has a gap in the proof
Round 3: Fills the gap from Round 2...
→ Complete proof achieved
# User only sees the final polished answer
Founder Opportunity
Test-time scaling represents a new paradigm where models can "think harder" on demand. This is especially valuable for high-stakes applications where accuracy matters more than speed - financial modeling, legal analysis, medical diagnosis. Consider where your users would pay for higher accuracy.
Benchmark Performance
Qwen3-Max-Thinking demonstrates significant performance across 19 established benchmarks:
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Max-Thinking | GPT-5.2-Thinking | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024 | 100% | 93.3% | 90.0% |
| HMMT | 100% | 96.7% | 93.3% |
| Arena-Hard v2 | 90.2 | 88.5 | 76.7 |
| GPQA Diamond | 78.4% | 76.1% | 74.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 68.2% | 71.5% | 69.8% |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 69.6% | 78.4% | 82.1% |
| Tau2-Bench (Agents) | 74.8 | 72.3 | 71.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 45.2% | 42.8% | 40.1% |
Pricing and Access
Qwen3-Max-Thinking API Pricing
Premium but competitive pricing
Available via Alibaba Cloud API
How to Access
- Alibaba Cloud API: Direct access at alibabacloud.com
- Qwen.ai: Web interface for testing
- OpenAI-compatible endpoint: Drop-in replacement for GPT API calls
- Anthropic-compatible endpoint: Works with Claude tools like Claude Code
API Compatibility: A Major Advantage
One of Qwen3-Max-Thinking's biggest selling points is API compatibility. Teams can switch to Qwen3 by simply changing the base_url and model name in their existing code:
# OpenAI SDK - just change these two lines
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1",
api_key="your-alibaba-cloud-key"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="qwen3-max-2026-01-23", # The thinking variant
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Prove the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality"
}]
)
# Works exactly like GPT-5.2 API
# Anthropic SDK - also supported
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = Anthropic(
base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/anthropic/v1",
api_key="your-alibaba-cloud-key"
)
# Works with Claude Code and other Anthropic tools
Use Cases for Founders
1. Mathematical Modeling
Perfect for fintech, quantitative trading, and scientific computing where mathematical accuracy is critical. The perfect AIME scores aren't just benchmarks - they indicate reliable math reasoning.
2. Complex Reasoning Applications
Legal document analysis, patent review, research synthesis - anywhere deep reasoning matters more than speed.
3. Agent Orchestration
The 74.8 Tau2-Bench score indicates strong tool-use and multi-step task handling. Excellent for building AI agents.
4. Cost Optimization
At $1.20/1M input tokens, Qwen3-Max-Thinking is cheaper than GPT-5.2 ($5/1M) for comparable reasoning capability on many benchmarks.
5. China Market Access
For founders building products for Chinese users, Qwen3 has obvious advantages in terms of availability, compliance, and support.
Qwen3-Max-Thinking vs DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2
How does Alibaba's offering compare to other Chinese and Western models?
| Feature | Qwen3-Max-Thinking | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.2-Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 1T+ | 671B MoE | Unknown |
| Context Length | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Test-Time Scaling | Yes | Limited | Yes |
| Open Source | No | Yes | No |
| Input Price | $1.20/1M | $0.27/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Math Benchmarks | 100% AIME | 96.7% AIME | 93.3% AIME |
| OpenAI API Compatible | Yes | Yes | Native |
Technical Deep Dive
Training Data
Qwen3-Max was trained on 36 trillion tokens - a massive dataset that includes web content, code, academic papers, and multilingual text. The Thinking variant adds reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) specifically for reasoning tasks.
Experience-Cumulative Reasoning
Unlike naive "best-of-N" sampling where multiple independent attempts are made and the best selected, Qwen3-Max-Thinking uses a multi-round strategy where each reasoning attempt builds on insights from previous rounds. This makes it more sample-efficient and produces more coherent reasoning chains.
Adaptive Tool Invocation
The model can automatically invoke tools during reasoning:
- Code interpreter: Execute Python for numerical verification
- Retrieval: Fetch relevant information from knowledge bases
- Calculator: Exact arithmetic for financial/scientific applications
Limitations to Consider
- Not open source: Unlike DeepSeek, Qwen3-Max-Thinking is API-only
- China-hosted: Data flows through Alibaba Cloud, which may have compliance implications
- Coding not best-in-class: SWE-Bench score trails Claude 5 Sonnet
- Test-time scaling latency: "Thinking" mode is slower than standard inference
- Regional availability: May have restrictions in certain jurisdictions
What This Means for the AI Industry
- China is competitive: Perfect math scores show Chinese labs can match or beat Western models on specific capabilities
- Test-time scaling is real: Multiple labs now showing that trading compute for intelligence works
- API compatibility matters: Easy switching between providers increases competition
- Specialization emerging: Different models excel at different tasks - Claude for coding, Qwen3 for math
Bottom Line for Founders
Qwen3-Max-Thinking is a serious contender for reasoning-heavy applications:
- Best-in-class math: If your product needs mathematical reasoning, this is currently the best
- Cost-effective: Cheaper than GPT-5.2 for comparable capability on many tasks
- Easy integration: OpenAI API compatibility means minimal code changes
- Consider your market: Great for global products, especially strong for China market access
For founders building products that require complex reasoning - financial modeling, scientific computing, legal analysis, or educational applications - Qwen3-Max-Thinking deserves serious evaluation.
Get Weekly AI Model Updates
We track new AI models, benchmark comparisons, and pricing changes. Subscribe free.